Sagarmatha National Park

Sagarmatha National Park_Keshav

Abstract

This study is focused on “Understanding Biodiversity Conservation and Vegetation of Sagarmatha National Park Solukhumbu. This study was carried out in the proposed books(Ukesh Raj Bhuju et al Biodiversity Resource Book); and resource persons of Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation(DNPWC) of Nepal and its website; Google Earth search on Protected Area, Haufler, Cooperrider, CBD report 2009. The study aims to understand ecology, economy and social strata in proposed National Park. The problems and issues are criticized to improve the condition of natural resources . Some major Methods included were secondary data analysis and different reports, websites, WebPages. It will provide few recommendations for improving and implementing policy and programs.
Location
Sagarmatha National Park is located to the north-east of Kathmandu in the Solukhumbu, district of Nepal( 27°45'-28°07'N, 86°28'-87°07'E). It was established in 19th July 1976. It has covered an area of 1148 square Kilometres.The park includes the highest peak in the world, Mt. Sagarmatha (Everest), and several other well-known peaks such as Lhotse, Nuptse, Cho Oyu, Pumori, Ama Dablam, Thamserku, Kwangde, Kangtaiga and Gyachung Kang. The park was added to the list of World Heritage Sites in 1979.A lots of endangered species are found in this park. This park is very famous for tourists because of Mt. Everest. The best season to visit this park is October, November, December to February. This park has one buffer zone which is mainlt situated in Chaunrikharka VDCs having 1288 households and 5896 population with 275 square kilometres . Namche, Khumjung and Chaunrikharka are the VDCs of the park. There are 8 buffer community forests.Glimpse of park is given in annex-I.
The main settlements are Namche Bazar, Khumjung, Khunde, Thame, Thyangboche, Pangboche and Phortse. The economy of the Khumbu Sherpa community has traditionally been heavily based on trade and livestock herding. But with the coming of international mountaineering expeditions since 1950 and the influx of foreign trekkers, the Sherpa economy today is becoming increasingly dependent on tourism.
Flora
Pine and hemlock forests are found at the lower elevations of the park. Above 3500m, trees such as birch, rhododendron, silver fir and juniper trees can be seen. Rhododendron show luminous colours in spring and monsoon seasons. The tree line in the region is at 4500m. Birch gives way to juniper and rhododendron scrubs. The park landscape is cut by deep rivers and glaciers. It can be segregated into four climatic zones. Where 1074 species of flora,166 vascular plants, 6 gymnosperms,109 dicots and 45 monocots are found.
Fauna
Endangered Animals : Endangered animals residing in this park are Snow Leopard, Musk Deer, Wild Yak, Red Panda and Himalayan Black Bear.Large Mammals : Big mammals commonly seen in the park are the Himalayan Tahr and Musk Deer. Other Mammals : Other mammals include the Himalayan Black Bear, Jackal, Weasels, Marten, Common Langur and the Himalayan Mousehare (Pika) all together 33. Birds : The park is the residence of more than 208 species of birds. The most common ones are the Impeyan Pheasant (Danphe), Redbilled Chough, Blood pheasant and Yellow-billed Chough.
Conservation
The National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act (1973), the Himalayan National Park Regulations (1979) and the Buffer Zone Management guidelines (1996,1999) provide the legal basis for the protection of the flora and fauna in Himalayan ecology.
Main objectives of the management plan are to ensure the protection of wildlife, water and soil resources because of the Park's national and international importance; also to safeguard the interests of the Sherpa residents and the many others downstream in Nepal and India affected by the condition of the Dudh Kosi catchment.
People in buffer zone are not having good strata, they are farmers e.g. farmers of Pangboche have the problem of livelihood. They have got the problem of lack of fire wood because of quota system of fire wood per year. Only 15 days the forests in the buffer zone are opened for the farmers.They can collect only one Bhari fire wood per day. It is not sufficient for the people that is why they prepare cow dung’s as their fuel. So that sustainable agricultural farming has been decreasing due to lack of manure. Lodges and Hotels are collecting more fire wood . Military people are checking pro-poor but not wel-to-do.
Tourism is main part of the Sagarmatha National Park. Local people are getting money only from rice/food and lodges. No any local initiatives are for poor people. Hotels and Lodges are reserved from Kathmandu that is why money again goes to capital city not to local people. Conservation is possible if local people are participated .Tourism activities are not focused to poor people.
Conservation Trials
Emerging participatory conservation initiatives
Following the success of the program’s implementation through the participation of local community members, HMGN has approved new policies regarding wildlife conservation through the participatory approach. The NPWC Act 1973 was amended for the fifth time in 2004. The new amendment includes provisions for wildlife farming, reproduction and research; elephant domestication; detailed specifications of the provision of buffer zones and specifications relating to the exchange of wildlife species with other countries. Following are the new policies recently approved by the government.
New policy on protected area management
HMGN has approved a policy in-execution regarding the handing over of management responsibilities of protected areas to interested INGOs/ NGOs or local communities. The objective is to ensure maximum participation of local people in sharing benefits from conservation activities, while contributing to biodiversity conservation and environmental protection. The decision of HMGN to hand over the management responsibility is inconformity with the Tenth Plan (2002-2007) and ensuring local people’s access to natural resources and equitable distribution of benefits.
Wildlife farming, reproduction and research policy
The Cabinet approved the “Wildlife farming, reproduction and research policy” in –execution 2060 on 28 August, 2003. The protected species that may be permitted for farming include gharial crocodile (Gavialis gangeticus), blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra), impeyan pheasant (Lophophorus impejanus), crimson horned pheasant (Tragopan satyra) and cheer pheasant (Catreus wallichi). Other species included in the list are barking deer, spotted deer, sambar, rhesus monkey, hog deer, wild boar, snakes and all other bird species. The seed animals for farming can be obtained from the DNPWC and the permission fee ranges from five thousand to forty thousand rupees. Permission for the farming of protected species could be obtained from the MFSC, while DNPWC has been authorized to issue permission for other species of wildlife.
Sagarmatha Community Agro-Forestry Project(SCAFP)
The WWF Nepal Program has initiated SCAFP in Sagarmatha National Park (SNP). The SCAFP is a multifaceted community-based conservation project, initiated in July 1996, to address the issue of deforestation in the Sagarmatha region. One of the major achievements of the project is the preparation of the BZ Management Plan for SNP. The other notable activity was the preparation of operational plans and statutes of four community forest user groups. Regular project activities such as nursery management, plantation and forest regeneration were undertaken by local CFUGs and Monastery Management Committees through financial grant support.
Conservation Critiques
Population growth is being the main problem for conservation. Because morepopulation needed more food, fodder, fuel, firewood; which are supplied from the forest of National Park; so that forests are being deforested day by day.Sagarmatha National Park is at very high altitude, energy sources are lack there that is why more forests are in encroachment because of firewood; which is the major source of energy. The growth of forest in high altitude is very low on the other side consumption is increasing due to population and tourists. Flow of tourists is one major issue in conservation.
Table 2:electricity and other facilities in households
S.N VDC Electricity Solar LP Gas
1 Namche 77 4 4
2 Khumjung 65 10 1
3 Chaunrikharka 74 14 4
There are 648 households in Park area, only 253 households have got facilities of modern energy sources. Other 395households are using fire wood as major source of energy. The foresting is being encroaching for fodder, firewood, furniture, medicinal herbs, grazing cattle.
Extinction is the most irreversible and tragic of all environmental calamities. With each plant and animal species that disappears, a precious part of creation is casually erased(Michel Soule,2004).Human population and consumption pressures are the root threat to biodiversity.Habitats degradation , overexploitation, climate change , human activities like agriculture, industries, urbanization , international trades etc are major root cause for biodiversity loss.
The IUCN red listed plants and animals are in Sagarmatha National park. Snow leopard, Musk deer, Red Panda, Impeyan Pheasant, Lammergeyer, Bearded vulture, Snow cock and yellow billed chough are red listed but their population and habitats are not properly managed. Violators and poachers are not arrested by government .Musk deer and Himalayan Thar have been hunting by poacher with the support of security force. Community awareness in the World Heritage Site has not been done properly. But kerosene depots are supplying fuel at Namche and Lukla. 230731 kg of garbage cleaned from the region of Sagarmatha National Park in 2001/2002 but it is not running in these days , which may cause more pollution in park area.
I took interviews with soil conservation officer of Kathmandu ,Mr. Shyam Sundar Shrestha, who was the assistant warden of Shivapuri National Park as well as researcher of eastern National Park.He told that due to the lack of young people in the area of Sagarmatha National Park ,there are threats on biodiversity conservation. Similarly Mr.Baburam Bhattarai asst ecologist of DNPWC Babarmahal, said that:”conservation problems are due to increase in population, high consumption of fire wood, and low rate of growth of plants in the alpine and sub-alpine region, where our Sagarmatha National Park lies on. He emphasized on people’s participation for conservation issues.
The conservation policy of Nepal has evolved from an early emphasis on species preservation and research with strict law enforcement practices to a more conciliatory and participatory approach. In buffer zone area of Sagarmatha National Park, there are two indigenous systems , they are 1.Di system and 2.Nawa syatem.The first system provides ideas and policies for Yaks,Sheeps and Chyangra grazing as well as management of fire wood.In this system old trees are referred to cut and prohibited to cut new ones. The second system is tourism management or trekking for tourists, who can goes and fair system. This system appointed guards for the forests.These systems are inactive. For conservation of flora and fauna these should activated.
It embarked upon a modern era of wildlife conservation with the enactment of the National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act in 1973. His Majesty’s Government of Nepal has approved three new policies, namely: 1) wildlife farming, reproduction and research policy; 2) policy on management of domesticated elephants; and 3) the new policy on protected area management.These policies have placed local communities in the center of the conservation program. A number of community-based participatory programs have been implemented inside, outside and in the BZs of PAs. The Buffer Zone Management Model and the Landscape Approach to biodiversity conservation are successful approaches in the context of Nepal.
Over the past three centuries, about the half of the world’s forest cover has been removed to make way for crops lands, pastures and settlements. In 25 countries no forest remains,and in additional 29 countries , more than 90% of the forest have been lost(Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005).So local people’s participation by Di and Nawa system will certainly help on conservation of biodiversity into National Parks.
Conclusion
The safeguard forest resources through community management is highly necessary. Reducing solid waste pollution is essential due to high flow of tourists.Increase in basic and social infrastructures of the local people is very much necessary, that may preserve and protect cultural heritages. Ethnic economic opportunities should be increase through tourism.And strengthening of buffer zone groups to ensure their own stake implementation is most important for ecological and biological conservation of the park, it is possible through indigenous practices through Di and Nawa system in upper Himalayan region.
The eight types of ecosystems, which are found in the area of Sagarmatha National Park is the main source of biodiversity. That is why the awareness in the societies of Namche, Khumjung and Chaunrikharka VDCs is very much essential. It can be conducted through local curriculum of school children, this right has been given by Department of Education ,Sanothimi Bhaktapur since 2009.Involvement of 46% of households in trekking and other business should be increased for conservation issues. Formation of buffer zone is not functioning well because of lack of young population’s participation. So new policy and program for youth should be introduced for conservation of nature and natural resources of the Sagarmatha National Park.
Strategies to reduce biodiversity losses in the area of Sagarmatha National park should focus on prioritizing places to work, understanding the causes of declines,and creating strategies that will be effecting in reducing threats. Although efforts focused on ecosystems and landscapes more likely to be effective in conserving multiple layers of biodiversity of Sagarmatha National Park areas, strategic approaches often act on the site or species level in alpine and sub-alpine region.
References
Bhuju,U.R. et al( 2007).Protected Areas ,Nepal Biodiversity Resource Book Protected Areas,Ramsar Sites,and World Heritage Sites,IUCN, Kathmandu.
BLAIKIE P., CAMERON J., SEDDON D., 1980. – Nepal in Crisis: Growth and Stagnation at the Periphery. New York, Oxford University Press.
BYERS A., 1987. – “An Assessment of Landscape Change in the Khumbu Region of Nepal Using Repeat Photography”. Mountain Research and Development, vol. 7, n°1, pp. 77-81.
DIXIT KM., TÜTING L., 1986. – Bikas-Binas. Development, The Change in Life an Environment of the Himalaya. Kathmandu Ratna Book Distribution, pp. 382-393.
DNPWC (2004). Annual Report. His Majesty’s Government of Nepal.
Groom,M.J.,Meffe,G.K.and Carrol,C.R.(2005).Focus on Primary Threats to Biodiversity,Principles of Conservation Biology,Sinauer Associates Inc,Massachusetts USA.